A V-Bot is a simple drawing machine based on two-center bipolar coordinates. Here's some web references:

- The first: HECTOR
- The smartest: Der Kritzler
- The saddest: SADbot - the Seasonally Affected Drawing robot
- The coolest: IOIO Plotter

The layout of a V-Bot is quite simple, two motors at the upper vertices at a
distance *d*, with two strings attached with lengths *l1* and *l2*. The drawing pen
rests at *(x,y).*

### Problems to solve

The typical math problems associated with robots are two: direct and inverse
kinematics. In this particular case the **inverse kinematics** is easy to obtain,
given the pen position obtain the lengths of the strings:

I'm using GNU/Octave, so here's some auxiliary functions:

function retval=l1c(x,y,d) retval= sqrt(y.^2+(x+d/2).^2); end

function retval=l2c(x,y,d) retval= sqrt(y.^2+(x-d/2).^2); end

These equations define a map from the cartesian coordinates *(x,y)* to *(l1,l2)*.

For the **direct kinematics** one has, with some simple algebra,

### Drawing resolution

One can tackle the problem of finding the resolution in two ways. Using the Jacobian and the arc length of a curve.

#### The Jacobian

The Jacobian defines the
ratio of a unit area in both coordinates. That is, it controls what happens
(direct kinematics) when a unit
area in *(l1,l2)* coordinates is transformed in to *(x,y)* coordinates, it
expands, contracts or stays the same. Values for
*J* greater than one gives an area expansion, lower than one the area is reduced. The Jacobian
controls the resolution of the drawing region.

What happens when the Jacobian is zero?
In simple terms it simply means that the transformation breaks, i.e. one can not use
the transformation between *(x,y)* and *(l1,l2)* to control the robot, and so at
the points or at the lines where Jacobian is zero the robot can not be
controlled (you can guess by simple inspection, with no math, what these lines/points are ;) ).

The Jacobian is given by

The next image shows the value of this Jacobian as a function of *(x,y)*

The code for the Jacobian `J(x,y,l1,l2)`

is given by

function retval=jac(x,y,d) retval=l1c(x,y,d).*l2c(x,y,d)./(d*y); end

For the inverse kinematics the Jacobian is the reciprocal of `J(x,y,l1,l2)`

, that is
`1/J(x,y,l1,l2)`

. In this case one gets

As expected (see pics) the problematic lines are *l1+l2=d* or simply the line *y=0* for any *x*.

The previous plots shows the "good" areas for drawing, somewhere below
the *y=0* line (*10cm?*). Will see the same result when considering the tension on the
strings (see below).

#### The arc length of a curve

The the arc length of a curve can be used to determine the "good" plotting region for the robot. This is done by taking the first order Taylor expansion of the direct and inverse kinematics equations. This however requires some prior considerations.

Because the relation between *(x,y)* and *(l1,l2)* is non-linear any
variation *(x,y)* will produce a non-linear variation in *(l1,l2)* this variation is path
dependent, the propagation of the variations depends if, for example, the pen
goes right and then up or by the hypotenuse to the same point on the drawing board.

Here goes:

function retval=lenghtl(x,y,dx,dy,d) dl1=(y.*dy+(x+d/2).*dx)./l1c(x,y,d); dl2=(y.*dy+(x-d/2).*dx)./l2c(x,y,d); retval=sqrt((dl1.^2+dl2.^2)/(dx.^2+dy.^2)); end

function retval=lenghtxy(x,y,dl1,dl2,d) dx=l1c(x,y,d)./d.*dl1 - l2c(x,y,d)./d.*dl2; dy=l1c(x,y,d).*(1-2*x/d)./(2*y).*dl1 + l2c(x,y,d).*(1+2*x/d)./(2*y).*dl2; retval=sqrt((dx.^2+dy.^2)/(dl1.^2+dl2.^2)); end

The next plot shows the ratio of unit lengths
in the direct kinematics plotted in the *(x,y)* plane by taking the average on
the 4 movements of the pen (right,0), (left,0), (0,up) and (0,down)^{1}.

The next plot takes the average length on 4 movements of the pen (left,up),
(right,up), (left,down) and (right,down)^{2}.

This last plot is similar to the final plot obtained by Bill Rasmussen. My point is that in this way we only account for the variation of the length of a straight segment in this coordinate transformation. Obviously the length changes after the transformation due to the non-linearity of the transformation and reflects the loss of resolution but the right way to determine the resolution is using the Jacobian.

The ends of the control lines in the above picture seem to be further away from the plotting surface than V plotters commonly seen on the internet.

That's just because the important tool to measure resolution is the Jacobian, even thought many of the V-Bot builders do not know about it ;)

### What about the tension on the strings?

One should also take into account the tension on each string. With some trigonometry one gets

There's only one singular configuration that one should take note, the case which yields

function retval=tension(x,y,d) m=1; g=1; l1=sqrt(y.^2+(d/2-x).^2); l2=sqrt(y.^2+(d/2+x).^2); cosa1=(d/2+x)./l1; cosa2=(d/2-x)./l2; sina1=y./l1; sina2=y./l2; T1=m*g*cosa2./(cosa1.*sina2+cosa2.*sina1); T2=m*g*cosa1./(cosa1.*sina2+cosa2.*sina1); retval=sqrt(T1.^2+T2.^2); end

This is shown in the following plot:

Also the cases of null tension on one of the strings , or , yields, respectivly, and or and .

1. Vertical displacements: (right,0), (left,0), (0,up) and (0,down)

2. Oblique displacements: (left,up), (right,up), (left,down) and (right,down)

**Palavras chave/keywords:**v-bot, dc motor, math, physics, polargraph

Criado/Created: 12-12-2015 [23:09]

Última actualização/Last updated: 11-01-2018 [13:50]

1999-2017 (ç) Tiago Charters de Azevedo

São permitidas cópias textuais parciais/integrais em qualquer meio com/sem alterações desde que se mantenha este aviso.

Verbatim copying and redistribution of this entire page are permitted provided this notice is preserved.